.png)
Every January, we convince ourselves that this is the year things will finally slow down.
And every January, engineering reality proves us wrong.
2026 will not be quieter.
It will be more automated, more AI-driven, and more fragile than anything we have seen before.
Last year, AI helped engineers write more code than ever. This year, it will help them write more infrastructure. And that is where the real shift begins.
Infrastructure is no longer something humans author line by line. It is generated, refactored, duplicated, and redeployed continuously by tools that do not understand context, ownership, or consequences. They optimize for speed, not correctness.
We are entering an era where infrastructure changes faster than human review cycles can keep up.
That reality forces a hard question we have avoided for too long.
If AI is writing infrastructure, who is responsible when it breaks?
For years, we built our cloud and DevOps tooling around detection. Scan the code. Flag the issues. Open a ticket. Hope someone fixes it before production feels the impact.
That model worked when infrastructure moved slowly and misconfigurations were occasional. It breaks down completely when infrastructure is generated at machine speed.
In 2026, the problem is not awareness.
Every team already knows they have misconfigurations.
The problem is that no one has time to fix them all.
This is why the conversation has to change.
Security cannot just find problems anymore.
DevOps cannot be expected to manually resolve endless alerts.
Platform teams cannot scale by adding more guardrails and hoping developers read them.
The only way forward is to move from finding issues to fixing them automatically and correctly.
That shift sounds obvious, but it is surprisingly uncomfortable. It forces us to ask whether we actually trust our tools to take action, not just make noise. It also forces us to confront a hard truth.
Not all AI is safe to use in production infrastructure workflows.
Generative models are powerful. They are also probabilistic by design. That is acceptable for writing marketing copy or brainstorming ideas. It is dangerous when modifying access controls, networking rules, or identity policies.
In 2026, the winners will be teams that separate creativity from correctness.
Use generative AI to explore.
Use deterministic systems to execute.
Infrastructure demands outcomes you can predict, verify, and repeat. The fix applied today must be the same fix applied tomorrow. It must map to policy, pass an audit, and not introduce new risk downstream.
This is not about slowing engineers down. It is about letting them move faster without breaking trust.
The most effective teams this year will not be the ones with the most alerts, the most scanners, or the most dashboards. They will be the ones that quietly remove risk from their infrastructure every day without human intervention.
They will treat infrastructure as something that can heal itself.
That is the real shift ahead.
Not AI that suggests.
AI that fixes.
2026 is the year we stop pretending AI only writes code.
It already runs our infrastructure.
Now it has to be responsible for it too.
